Criminal defense lawyer Robert T. Ruth has successfully defended people

accused of crimes in Wisconsin and federal courts since 1993.


 
 
 Robert T. Ruth

  Law Offices, S.C.

   Criminal Defense Lawyers

 

(608) 257-2540
Free Initial Consultation

Se Habla Español

Successful Defense of Wisconsin and Federal Criminal Cases

  

 

Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer Robert T. Ruth has successfully defended people accused of crimes in Wisconsin and federal courts since 1993.  If you face a criminal charge in a Wisconsin or federal court, contact criminal defense attorney Robert T. Ruth at (608) 257-2540 for a free consultation.

 

Dane County OWI, 2nd  Offense - Motion to Suppress Granted, Case Dismissed

Madison, WI  My client's car was stopped in a parking lot of a closed business after bar time.  The officer said he stopped him to investigate why he was in the parking lot of a closed business after hours.  We contended that the stop was illegal and that all of the evidence obtained after the stop should be suppressed.  The judge granted the motion to suppress and the state moved to dismiss the case.

Dane County First Degree Sexual Assault of a Child-Not Guilty Verdict

Madison, WI  The Dane County District Attorney charged my client with First Degree Sexual Assault of a Child.  This is a 40 year felony, so the stakes were high.  The alleged victim claimed that she woke up to my client assaulting her sexually, and then saw him run up the stairs in his underwear.  Her mother claimed that she woke up as well and saw my client jump up and run away from girl in his underwear.  The truth started to come out on cross examination, however, as the stories kept changing and the alleged victim and her mother had no good answers for many of the discrepancies.  In the end, the jury deliberated for about an hour before it delivered the not guilty verdict, which meant a complete acquittal for my client.

Federal Charge-Felon in Possession of a Firearm – Not Guilty Verdict

Madison, WI  In a Western District of Wisconsin firearm case, several witnesses claimed that they saw my client, a felon, in possession of a .357 magnum and a rifle.  Both guns were allegedly found during a search of my client’s mother’s house.  The finger print expert at trial even testified that the rifle had my client’s fingerprint on it.  On cross examination, however, the witness stories started to break down on the question of which gun, if any, they saw my client possess.  As far as the fingerprint evidence, there was no proof that the fingerprint was made on the gun after the felony conviction, nor was there proof that the fingerprint was made on the gun by knowing, intentional contact with it.  After lengthy deliberations, the jury came back not guilty and my client was exonerated.

Federal Drug Charge – Motion to Suppress Granted, Case Dismissed 

Milwaukee, WI  In an Eastern District of Wisconsin case, my client was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine.  Federal agents working undercover allegedly arranged to purchase one kilogram of cocaine.  Just before the proposed controlled buy, agents arrested my client.  They found cocaine in my client’s vehicle, but not the one kilogram they anticipated in the controlled buy.  After his arrest, my client made several statements that implicated him in the controlled buy.  After a contested hearing, however, the court granted my motion to suppress the statements.   This took the wind out of the prosecutor’s sail, and the government eventually dismissed the charges.

Federal Drug Conspiracy – “Mere presence” not enough, case dismissed

Milwaukee, WI  In the federal court in the Eastern District of Wisconsin my client was charged with distribution of a controlled substance and conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance.   Undercover agents performed a controlled buy of cocaine from my client’s son.  My client was allegedly present during the transaction.  Agents also recorded a phone called between my client and his son that they said implicated my client in the drug operation.  In the end, I convinced the prosecutor that my client’s presence at the drug deal was nothing more than “mere presence” at the scene of a crime and “mere association” with coconspirators, which is not enough to prove a criminal charge. The charges were dismissed and my client was released.

Richland County OWI – Motion to Suppress Evidence Granted/Not Guilty Verdict 

Richland Center, WI  My client was found sleeping in his car near the side of the road.  The officer woke him up and eventually arrested him for operating while intoxicated and operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration.  The court agreed with me that the officer lacked probable cause for the arrest and granted my motion to suppress the evidence obtained after the arrest.  The state dismissed the prohibited alcohol concentration charge, but refused to dismiss the OWI case.  The client was finally vindicated at trial, however, by a not guilty verdict on the OWI charge and a complete dismissal of all charges.

 

Drunk Driving

 

Domestic Crimes

 Disorderly Conduct

 Battery

 Intimidation of Victim

 Violate Restraining Order

   

Drug Crimes

 Simple Possession

 Possession with Intent

 Sale of Drugs

 Manufacturing

 Maintaining a Dwelling

 Possession of Paraphernalia

 

Sex Crimes

 Sexual Assault-Rape

 Sexual Assault of a Child

 Child Enticement

 Child Pornography

 

Financial Crimes

 Worthless Checks

 Uttering a Forged Instrument

 Fraud

 

Property Crimes

 Theft

 Shoplifting

 Receiving Stolen Property

 Burglary

 Criminal Damage to Property

 

Homicide

 Intentional Homicide

 Reckless Homicide

 Vehicular Homicide

 Felony Murder

 

Misdemeanor

 Resisting Arrest

 Obstructing

 Trespass

 Carrying a Concealed Weapon

 OAR/OAS

 

Felony

 Substantial Battery

 Aggravated Battery

 Battery to Police Officer

 Reckless Injury

 Endangering Safety

 Robbery

 Child Abuse

 Kidnapping

 Felon in Possession of Firearm

 Bribery

 Arson

 Escape

 Harboring or Aiding Felon

 Perjury

 False Imprisonment

 Stalking

 

Criminal Appeals

 Federal Criminal Appeals

 Wisconsin Criminal Appeals

 

Federal Criminal Defense

 Drugs
 
Conspiracy

 Firearms
 
Fraud-Embezzlement
 
Internet/Sex Crimes

 Immigration Crimes
 
Target Letter
 
Grand Jury Subpoena

Asset Forfeiture

 

Bayfield County, OWI, 3rd Reduced to a First Offense on Appeal

 

Bayfield, WI  The client was charged with OWI, 3rd offense.  I challenged the constitutionality of the second offense.  The trial court denied the motion and imposed an 80 day jail sentence, along with a fine of almost $2,000.00.  The court granted our motion for bail pending appeal, however, and we appealed immediately.  The court of appeals reversed the order denying the challenge to the prior offense and ordered the court to disqualify the prior offense.  The case was eventually reduced to a first offense without the client spending a day in jail.

 

Juneau County, OWI, 3rd Reduced to First Offense

 

Mauston, WI  The client faced a third offense OWI, which carries a jail sentence of 30 days to one year.  The guidelines suggested a sentence of 60 days based on the facts of the case.  The trial court granted my motion to disqualify from consideration the second offense.  This reduced the charge to a first offense and eliminated the possibility of jail for my client and dramatically reduced the fine.

 

Sauk County Felony Battery – Not Guilty Verdict

 

Baraboo, WI  Often the investigation makes the difference in a criminal case.  This was the case in one felony battery case that I had where the alleged victim claimed that my client hit him in the face in a Sauk County tavern.  There was no question that the alleged victim was hit in the face, as he received substantial injuries, and we did not dispute that my client was the one who hit him, as my client openly admitted it from the beginning.  The defense was self-defense.  The client testified that he thought the victim was about to hit him, so he struck first.  The alleged victim denied the aggressive behavior, but his story broke down significantly during cross examination.  The real game changer, however, was discovered by my investigator.  In the weeks before trial my investigator asked questions at the tavern until he found an independent witness who saw the ruckus and was willing to talk about it.  This witness, who did not know my client, testified that he saw the alleged victim in my client’s face acting aggressively just before the punch.  This was a game changer because the state had no legitimate way to challenge this witness’s credibility.   The jury came back with a not guilty verdict in an hour or so.

 

Dane County Burglary Charge – Dismissed at Preliminary Hearing

 

Madison, WI  Here is another example of where the investigation made the difference.  My client was charged with burglary based mostly on the statement of the alleged victim.  At the beginning of the case, before we even had discovery, I sent out my investigator to ask some questions.  He found the alleged victim and interviewed her.  As it turned out, she admitted that she was not in a position to see the burglar, which was contrary to what the police reported.  When I presented this fact to the prosecutor she balked at first, but later relented when I played her the recording of the interview between the alleged victim and my investigator.  The charge was dismissed at the preliminary hearing.

 

Rock County Second Degree Sexual Assault of a Child-Dismissed

 

Janesville, WI  This is another situation where the investigation tipped the scale in our favor.  The state charged my client with sexual assault based on a statement made by the alleged victim.   I took the case over from another attorney several months after it started.  We had a strong case and planned to fight it at trial.  A few days before the trial, however, the big break came.  My investigator got the alleged victim to talk to him. That is when she blurted out that she made up the whole thing.  The prosecution dismissed the charges a few days later.      

 

Milwaukee County OWI, 3rd Reduced to a First Offense

 

Milwaukee, Wis   The client was charged with OWI, 3rd offense.  The state offered to settle the case for five months jail, plus extraordinary fines.  We rejected the settlement offer and I challenged the constitutionality of the second offense.   After a contested hearing, the court agreed with me and granted the motion.  The charge was reduced to a first offense and the possibility of jail was eliminated. 

 

Dane County Prison Sentence – Conviction Reversed in Court of Appeals

 

Madison, Wis  Before I represented him the client was convicted of a misdemeanor offense as a habitual criminal and sentenced to the maximum three years prison.  One of the first things I did when I took the case was get the client out on bond pending appeal.  Next, I challenged the sufficiency of the evidence.  The judge had received into evidence at trial a document that was essential to the conviction, but it was never properly authenticated in court.  It may seem like a small detail, but because the document was not properly authenticated, the court of appeals said that it could not be considered in evidence.  Once that document was removed from consideration, the evidence was insufficient to convict.  Fortunately, the client did not start the prison sentence, because he was released on bond pending appeal.  The conviction and sentence were reversed and that was the end of the matter.

 

Juneau County, OWI 3rd, Reduced to a First Offense

 

Mauston, Wis  My client was charged in Juneau County with OWI, 3rd Offense.  The state offered to settle the case with 90 days in jail and fines of around $2,500.00.  We rejected the offer and challenged the constitutionality of the second offense.  The court granted the motion, the case was reduced to a first offense and the possibility of jail was eliminated.

 

Sauk County, OWI, 4th Reduced to a 3rd Offense

 

Baraboo, Wis  Winning a challenge to a prior offense does not always eliminate the possibility of jail, but it usually makes the situation much better.  In a Sauk County case charging OWI, 4th Offense, the guidelines called for a sentence of 180 days in jail.  I challenged the constitutionality of one of the prior convictions.  After a contested hearing, the judge agreed with me and reduced the charge to a third offense.  This lowered the jail sentence to 75 days.

 

Federal 15 year Mandatory Minimum Defeated by State Collateral Attack

 

Madison, WI  In the federal court in the Western District of Wisconsin my client was charged with felon in possession of a firearm.  He faced a 15 year mandatory minimum under the Armed Career Criminal Act because of three or more convictions in state court for violent felonies.   I filed a motion in the state case under Wisconsin Statute sec. 974.06, Stats., collaterally attacking the guilty pleas.  The prosecutor contested the motion, but to no avail.  The state court granted the motion and permitted the client to withdraw the guilty pleas in the violent felonies.  At that point, we quickly entered a plea in the federal case and proceeded to sentencing.  Because the state convictions were vacated, they did not count as criminal history or as predicate offenses under the ACCA.  Thus, there was no mandatory minimum and the federal judge sentenced the client to 2 ½ years instead of the minimum 15 years under the ACCA.

 

Juneau County OWI, 3rd reduced to 2nd Offense

 

Mauston, WI  The Juneau County District Attorney charged my client with OWI, 3rd offense.  Based on the alleged facts of the case, the guidelines recommended a 90 day jail sentence.  We successfully challenged the constitutionality of the second offense, which reduced the charge to a second offense.  The court imposed a 30 day sentence.

 

Columbia County drug charges – Not Guilty Verdicts 

 

Portage, WI  This case started like many drug cases. The police found illegal drugs and paraphernalia hidden in my client’s car.  My client owned the car, and he was the sole occupant at the time of the police contact.  At trial, however, we presented evidence that other people were in the car earlier that evening and were in a position to leave the drugs in the car.  The jury came back not guilty on both counts.

 

Sauk County OWI 3rd, reduced to a 2nd Offense

 

Baraboo, WI  The Sauk County District Attorney charged my client with OWI, 3rd Offense.  Under the local guidelines and the alleged facts of the case, this meant a sentence of 90-120 days.  I successfully challenged the constitutionality of the second offense, which reduced this offense to a second offense.  We ended up with 40 day jail sentence.

 

Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer Robert T. Ruth has successfully defended people accused of crimes in Wisconsin and federal courts since 1993.  If you face a criminal charge in a Wisconsin or federal court, contact criminal defense attorney Robert T. Ruth

at (608) 257-2540 for a free consultation.

Criminal Defense Attorney Robert T. Ruth practices in all areas of criminal defense throughout Wisconsin and Federal Courts.  Call him for a criminal case in any of the following cities or counties:

Milwaukee Criminal Defense Attorney, Milwaukee Criminal Defense Lawyer, Milwaukee Criminal Lawyer, Milwaukee Criminal Attorney,  Kenosha Criminal Defense Attorney, Kenosha Criminal Defense Lawyer, Kenosha Criminal Lawyer, Kenosha Criminal Attorney, Racine Criminal Defense Attorney, Racine Criminal Defense Lawyer, Racine Criminal Lawyer, Racine Criminal Attorney, Janesville Criminal Defense Attorney, Janesville Criminal Defense Lawyer, Janesville Criminal Lawyer, Janesville Criminal Attorney, Beloit Criminal Defense Attorney, Beloit Criminal Defense Lawyer, Beloit Criminal Lawyer, Beloit Criminal Attorney

Alma, Antigo, Appleton, Ashland, Balsam Lake, Baraboo, Barron, Black River Falls, Chilton, Chippewa Falls, Crandon, Darlington, Dodgeville, Durand, Eagle River, Eau Claire, Elkhorn, Ellsworth, Florence, Fond du Lac, Friendship, Green Bay, Green Lake, Hayward, Hudson, Hurley, Janesville, Jefferson, Juneau, Kenosha, Keshena, Kewaunee, La Crosse, Ladysmith, Lancaster, Madison, Middleton, Monroe, Montello, Neillsville, Oconto, Oshkosh, Phillips, Port Washington, Portage, Prairie du Chien, Racine, Rhinelander, Richland Center, Shawano, Sheboygan, Shell Lake, Sparta, Stevens Point, Sturgeon Bay, Superior, Viroqua, Washburn, Waukesha, Waupaca, Wautoma, West Bend, Whitehall, Wisconsin Rapids.

Adams, Ashland, Barron, Bayfield, Brown, Buffalo, Burnett, Calumet, Chippewa, Clark, Columbia, Crawford, Dane, Dodge, Door, Douglas, Dunn, Eau Claire, Florence, Fond du Lac, Forest, Grant, Green, Green Lake, Iowa, Iron, Jackson, Jefferson, Juneau, Kenosha, Kewaunee, LaCrosse, Lafayette, Langlade, Lincoln, Manitowoc, Marathon, Marinette, Marquette, Menominee, Milwaukee, Monroe, Oconto, Oneida, Outagamie, Ozaukee, Pepin, Pierce, Polk, Portage, Price, Racine, Richland, Rock, Rusk, Saint Croix, Sauk, Sawyer, Shawano, Sheboygan, Taylor, Trempealeau, Vernon, Vilas, Walworth, Washburn, Washington, Waukesha, Waupaca, Waushara, Winnebago, Wood.

 

 Robert T. Ruth Law Offices, S.C.

 Madison Criminal Defense Lawyer

 7 North Pinckney St., Suite 240
 Madison, Wisconsin 53703
 (608) 257-2540
 rob@madisonattorney.com

Call Madison criminal defense attorney Robert T. Ruth at (608) 257-2540

   
 

This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

The material and information contained on these pages and on the pages linked from these pages are intended to provide information and not legal advice. The information presented on these pages may not be applicable to your specific legal or factual situation. The information presented is based on Wisconsin law, and may not be accurate in other states. 

Sending an e-mail or downloading information from this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm.  Remember that electronic mail on the Internet is not secure and, hence, there can be a risk of interception  This website is not intended to be a solicitation in any state where this website fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state. This site is meant to be informational only, consistent with the legal profession's obligation to educate the public.

© 1999-2013 Copyright Robert T. Ruth. All Rights Reserved.