Start with the evidence, not the charge label
Intentional-homicide cases require a careful review of the physical evidence, statements, witness accounts, forensic conclusions and the prosecution’s theory of intent. Early decisions can affect what evidence is preserved and how the case develops.
Issues to examine
- Forensic and physical evidence
- Statements, interviews and interrogation evidence
- Witness credibility and identification
- Intent, self-defense or other contested legal issues when supported by the facts
- Expert evidence, scene evidence and reconstruction
- Trial strategy and preservation of appellate issues
Defense strategy depends on the record
A useful defense review compares the complaint or investigative theory with the actual evidence. That can include police reports, recordings, digital information, witness accounts, physical evidence, prior records and the legal basis for police action. The strategy may involve investigation, motions, negotiation, trial preparation, sentencing advocacy or preserving issues for appeal.
Madison-based criminal defense since 1993
Robert T. Ruth represents clients from a downtown Madison office in Wisconsin state and federal criminal matters. The first consultation is an opportunity to identify the stage of the case, immediate deadlines and the evidence that should be reviewed or preserved.
Common questions
Why is early investigation important in a homicide case?
Witness memories, digital information, video and scene evidence can change or disappear. Preserving relevant information early can be important.
Can forensic evidence be challenged?
Expert methods, assumptions, laboratory work and the way conclusions are presented can all require careful review.
Does the firm handle homicide appeals?
The firm handles Wisconsin and federal criminal appeals and postconviction matters in addition to trial-level defense.
Related information
This page provides general information and is not legal advice. The law, defenses and possible consequences depend on the facts and current law.