Start with the evidence, not the charge label
Federal drug cases may combine surveillance, informants, controlled buys, phone records, searches, statements and alleged conspiracy evidence. The defense should separate what a person actually did from assumptions based on association with others.
Issues to examine
- Search warrants and seizures
- Confidential-source and cooperating-witness evidence
- Phone, message and location evidence
- Alleged quantity and attribution issues
- Conspiracy, knowledge and intent
- Statements, plea terms and federal sentencing issues
Defense strategy depends on the record
A useful defense review compares the complaint or investigative theory with the actual evidence. That can include police reports, recordings, digital information, witness accounts, physical evidence, prior records and the legal basis for police action. The strategy may involve investigation, motions, negotiation, trial preparation, sentencing advocacy or preserving issues for appeal.
Madison-based criminal defense since 1993
Robert T. Ruth represents clients from a downtown Madison office in Wisconsin state and federal criminal matters. The first consultation is an opportunity to identify the stage of the case, immediate deadlines and the evidence that should be reviewed or preserved.
Common questions
What is a federal drug conspiracy case?
A conspiracy charge focuses on an alleged agreement and participation. The government still must prove the required elements with admissible evidence.
Can a person be charged based on another witness’s statements?
Cooperating witnesses may be important in federal cases, but credibility, incentives, consistency and corroboration can be examined.
Does the firm handle federal drug appeals?
Yes. The practice includes federal criminal appeals and postconviction matters.
Related information
This page provides general information and is not legal advice. The law, defenses and possible consequences depend on the facts and current law.